Abstract

The aging brain causes the problems associated with decision making, memory loss, language problems, personality problems, and changes in behavior. Physicians decide treatment based on disease progression and the patient’s overall health. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) are two majorly reported clinical abnormalities in today’s time. The adversity of the disease can be controlled with timely diagnosis and choice of treatment modality. Noninvasive treatment like transcranial electrical stimulation has shown effective results in drug-resistant and early diagnosed patients. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) uses low electrical direct current through specialized stimulating electrodes. The induced electric field within the targeted area can be measured in vivo with greater accuracy with its limitation of applicability to humans. Characteristics of the tissue changes with its compositional variation with different tissue mass like Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF), Skull, Skin, Gray matter, and White matter. Computational modeling of tissue characteristics and external stimulation provides a better solution for the effective measurement of spatial electric field distribution. The effectiveness of treatment greatly depends on targeted electrical stimulation with precise localization of stimulation electrodes. Apart from the location of the stimulation electrodes, electrode size, shape, duration of stimulation, the patient’s specific anatomy, the strength of the current, and conductivity of tissue alter the treatment efficacy and clinical outcome. In this study, we have obtained Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) images from the AD neuroimaging initiative to create patient-specific head models for AD and MCI patients. Simulation of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation (SimNIBS) open-source software used for calculating electric field induced by transcranial electrical stimulation. Obtained results were compared for both patient groups to know the variation of electric field distribution across the head regions. Results suggest that electric field distribution varies with selected stimulation parameters and patient-specific head models. Increasing current intensity by 25% of 1 mA results in a 25% increase in electric field strength, whereas a 50% increase in 1 mA of current intensity results in a nearly 49.46 % increase in electric field strength of Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (LDLPFC). With standard conductivities of head tissues and uniform stimulation parameters for both the patients, we obtained varied electric field strength which signifies the tissue abnormality caused by neurodegenerative disease.

Keyword

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Alzheimer’s disease, Mild cognitive impairment, Electric field distribution.

Cite this article

Pancholi U, Dave V

Refference

[1][1]Alzheimers Association. 2017 Alzheimers disease facts and figures. Alzheimers & Dementia. 2017; 13(4):325-73.

[2][2]Roberts R, Knopman DS. Classification and epidemiology of MCI. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. 2013; 29(4):753-72.

[3][3]Andrade C, Arumugham SS, Thirthalli J. Adverse effects of electroconvulsive therapy. Psychiatric Clinics. 2016; 39(3):513-30.

[4][4]Ben-Menachem E. Vagus nerve stimulation, side effects, and long-term safety. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2001; 18(5):415-8.

[5][5]Prehn K, Flöel A. Potentials and limits to enhance cognitive functions in healthy and pathological aging by tDCS. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 2015; 9:1-14.

[6][6]Das S, Holland P, Frens MA, Donchin O. Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on neuronal functions. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2016; 10:1-7.

[7][7]Sharma G, Chowdhury SR. Enhancement in focality of non-invasive brain stimulation through high definition (HD) anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) techniques. In conference on computational intelligence in bioinformatics and computational biology 2019 (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

[8][8]Marceglia S, Mrakic-Sposta S, Rosa M, Ferrucci R, Mameli F, Vergari M, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates cortical neuronal activity in Alzheimers disease. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2016; 10:134.

[9][9]Meinzer M, Lindenberg R, Phan MT, Ulm L, Volk C, Flöel A. Transcranial direct current stimulation in mild cognitive impairment: behavioral effects and neural mechanisms. Alzheimers & Dementia. 2015; 11(9):1032-40.

[10][10]Saturnino GB, Antunes A, Thielscher A. On the importance of electrode parameters for shaping electric field patterns generated by tDCS. Neuroimage. 2015; 120:25-35.

[11][11]Rodella C, Cespón J, Repetto C, Pellicciari MC. Customized application of TDCS in clinical rehabilitation of Alzheimer’s Disease. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2021; 15:1-4.

[12][12]Indahlastari A, Albizu A, O’Shea A, Forbes MA, Nissim NR, Kraft JN, et al. Modeling transcranial electrical stimulation in the aging brain. Brain Stimulation. 2020; 13(3):664-74.

[13][13]Vasavada MM, Martinez B, Wang J, Eslinger PJ, Gill DJ, Sun X, et al. Central olfactory dysfunction in Alzheimers disease and mild cognitive impairment: a functional MRI study. Journal of Alzheimers Disease. 2017; 59(1):359-68.

[14][14]Wang H, Wang X, Jin J, Zhang W, Li Y, Liu Z, Yin T. Simultaneous stimulation using RTMS and TDCS produces the most effective modulation of motor cortical excitability in healthy subjects: a pilot study. Neuroscience Letters. 2019; 694:46-50.

[15][15]Jog MV, Wang DJ, Narr KL. A review of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the individualized treatment of depressive symptoms. Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry. 2019; 17:17-22.

[16][16]Hill AT, Rogasch NC, Fitzgerald PB, Hoy KE. Impact of concurrent task performance on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-Induced changes in cortical physiology and working memory. Cortex. 2019; 113:37-57.

[17][17]Laakso I, Mikkonen M, Koyama S, Hirata A, Tanaka S. Can electric fields explain inter-individual variability in transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex? Scientific Reports. 2019; 9(1):1-10.

[18][18]Modolo J, Denoyer Y, Wendling F, Benquet P. Physiological effects of low-magnitude electric fields on brain activity: advances from in vitro, in vivo and in silico models. Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering. 2018; 8:38-44.

[19][19]Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. The Journal of Physiology. 1952; 117(4):500-44.

[20][20]Brunel N, Van Rossum MC. Lapicques 1907 paper: from frogs to integrate-and-fire. Biological Cybernetics. 2007; 97(5):337-9.

[21][21]Lee S, Lee C, Park J, Im CH. Individually customized transcranial temporal interference stimulation for focused modulation of deep brain structures: a simulation study with different head models. Scientific Reports. 2020; 10(1):1-11.

[22][22]Saturnino GB, Puonti O, Nielsen JD, Antonenko D, Madsen KH, Thielscher A. SimNIBS 2.1: a comprehensive pipeline for individualized electric field modelling for transcranial brain stimulation. Brain and Human Body Modeling. 2019:3-25.

[23][23]Windhoff M, Opitz A, Thielscher A. Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: an optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models. Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services. 2013:923-35.

[24][24]Jurcak V, Tsuzuki D, Dan I. 10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems revisited: their validity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems. Neuroimage. 2007; 34(4):1600-11.

[25][25]Neulinger K, Oram J, Tinson H, OGorman J, Shum DH. Prospective memory and frontal lobe function. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition. 2016; 23(2):171-83.

[26][26]Berlucchi G, Vallar G. The history of the neurophysiology and neurology of the parietal lobe. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 2018; 151:3-30.

[27][27]Clark RE. Current topics regarding the function of the medial temporal lobe memory system. Behavioral Neurosciences.2018:1-30.

[28][28]Javed K, Reddy V, Lui F. Neuroanatomy, cerebral cortex. StatPearls Publishing.2019.

[29][29]Mollet GA. Fundamentals of human neuropsychology. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education. 2008; 6(2): R3–R4.

[30][30]Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW, Fischer JS. Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, USA; 2004.

[31][31]Mendoza J, Foundas A. Clinical neuroanatomy: a neurobehavioral approach. Springer Science & Business Media; 2007.

[32][32]Von Bartheld CS, Bahney J, Herculano‐Houzel S. The search for true numbers of neurons and glial cells in the human brain: a review of 150 years of cell counting. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2016; 524(18):3865-95.

[33][33]Seibt O, Brunoni AR, Huang Y, Bikson M. The pursuit of DLPFC: non-neuronavigated methods to target the left dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex with symmetric bicephalic transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimulation. 2015; 8(3):590-602.

[34][34]Bunai T, Hirosawa T, Kikuchi M, Fukai M, Yokokura M, Ito S, et al. tDCS-induced modulation of GABA concentration and dopamine release in the human brain: a combination study of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and positron emission tomography. Brain Stimulation. 2021; 14(1):154-60.

[35][35]André S, Heinrich S, Kayser F, Menzler K, Kesselring J, Khader PH, et al. At-home tDCS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improves visual short-term memory in mild vascular dementia. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2016; 369:185-90.

[36][36]Holczer A, Németh VL, Vékony T, Vécsei L, Klivényi P, Must A. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Alzheimers disease and mild cognitive impairment—a state-of-the-art review on methodological characteristics and stimulation parameters. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2020; 14:179.

[37][37]Nitsche MA, Doemkes S, Karakose T, Antal A, Liebetanz D, Lang N, et al. Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2007; 97(4):3109-17.

[38][38]Bhattacharjee S, Kashyap R, Rapp B, Oishi K, Desmond JE, Chen SA. Simulation analyses of tDCS montages for the investigation of dorsal and ventral pathways. Scientific Reports. 2019; 9(1):1-17.

[39][39]https://simnibs.github.io/simnibs/build/html/index.html. Accessed 26 May 2021.

[40][40]J. Peters, G. Stinstra, M. Hendriks M. Estimation of the electrical conductivity of human tissue. Electromagnetics. 2001; 21(7-8):545-57.

[41][41]Opitz A, Paulus W, Will S, Antunes A, Thielscher A. Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroimage. 2015; 109:140-50.

[42][42]Wagner TA, Zahn M, Grodzinsky AJ, Pascual-Leone A. Three-dimensional head model simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2004; 51(9):1586-98.

[43][43]Laakso I, Tanaka S, Mikkonen M, Koyama S, Sadato N, Hirata A. Electric fields of motor and frontal tDCS in a standard brain space: a computer simulation study. Neuroimage. 2016; 137:140-51.