Abstract

Due to growing concerns about air pollution and climate change, stricter emission regulations for road vehicles are affecting the diesel vehicle market, especially in passenger car and light-duty vehicle segments. As a consequence of this, spark ignition (SI) engines are outnumbering the compression-ignition (CI) engines in those segments. But low compression ratio and operating at air–fuel ratio closer to stoichiometric, makes SI engines less efficient than CI engines. Lean combustion can boost SI engine efficiency, however, extreme lean condition increases instability in the combustion. The concept of prechamber ignition is a potential solution to achieve lean combustion by overcoming its drawbacks. The prechamber design is a critical factor that controls the combustion efficiency. Therefore, in this research work, a new prechamber design with two different volumes of 2 and 5% of that of clearance volume was proposed to improve efficiency and reduce the exhaust emissions of the gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine. For this purpose, a numerical investigation was performed using the STAR-CD platform on the proposed model. The engine simulation was carried out for full load condition at 1000 rpm with a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. Initially, the numerical results of the baseline engine model (four-valve Siamese engine without pre-chamber) were validated using engine experiment results. Then the numerical study was performed to study the effect of pre-chamber design on the mixture distribution, combustion, and emission parameters and the results were compared with that of the base engine model. The results revealed that the model with 2% pre-chamber volume had shown better fuel evaporation and thereby resulted in better homogeneous mixture formation at the start of combustion when compared to the 5% pre-chamber model. However, both models showed inferior evaporation and mixture formation compared to the baseline model. The ignition delay time was decreased for pre-chamber models, with 5% model being the least. In terms of in-cylinder pressure, the 2% volume had higher pressure than the other two models. Furthermore, the carbon dioxide (CO2) was almost similar for all the models. The formation of carbon monoxide (CO) compound was lesser for the 5% pre-chamber volume model than in other models. However, the 5% model showed the highest nitrogen oxide (NO) and soot formation. Overall, the model with 2% pre-chamber volume had shown better performance than the other two models.

Keyword

Numerical, GDI, Pre-chamber, Mixture distribution, NO, CO.

Cite this article

Muthukumar S, Gunasekaran EJ, Ramesh P, Karthikeyan M

Refference

[1][1]Zhang Z, Hu J, Tan D, Li J, Jiang F, Yao X, et al. Multi-objective optimization of the three-way catalytic converter on the combustion and emission characteristics for a gasoline engine. Energy. 2023; 277:127634.

[2][2]Joshi A. Review of vehicle engine efficiency and emissions. SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility. 2019; 1(2):734-61.

[3][3]Vikneswaran M, Saravanan CG, Manickam M, Sasikala J, Josephin JF, Pugazhendhi A, et al. A study on the feasibility of bergamot peel oil-gasoline blends for spark-ignition engines. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022; 339:130515.

[4][4]Subramanian K, Paramasivam SA, Dillikannan D, Jayabal R. Effect of pilot fuel injection strategies and EGR on a CRDI diesel engine powered by simmondsia chinensis seed biodiesel-methyl acetate blend. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2023; 58:103345.

[5][5]Vikneswaran M, Saravanan CG, Sasikala J, Ramesh P, Varuvel EG. Combustion analysis of higher order alcohols blended gasoline in a spark ignition engine using endoscopic visualization technique. Fuel. 2022; 322:124134.

[6][6]Zhu S, Akehurst S, Lewis A, Yuan H. A review of the pre-chamber ignition system applied on future low-carbon spark ignition engines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022; 154:111872.

[7][7]Wang Z, Liu H, Reitz RD. Knocking combustion in spark-ignition engines. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2017; 61:78-112.

[8][8]Heywood JB. Internal combustion engine fundamentals. McGraw-Hill Education; 2018.

[9][9]Muthukumar S, Ramesh P, Gunasekaran EJ. A preliminary review to study the influence of pre-chamber ignition system on spark ignition engine characteristics. Journal of Xidian University.2021; 15(12):419-39.

[10][10]Serrano D, Zaccardi JM, Müller C, Libert C, Habermann K. Ultra-lean pre-chamber gasoline engine for future hybrid powertrains. SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility. 2019; 2(2):607-22.

[11][11]Jamrozik A. Lean combustion by a pre-chamber charge stratification in a stationary spark ignited engine. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2015; 29:2269-78.

[12][12]Frasci E, Rosa RN, Moreno BP, Arsie I, Jannelli E. Impact of prechamber design and air–fuel ratio on combustion and fuel consumption in a SI engine equipped with a passive TJI. Fuel. 2023; 345:128265.

[13][13]Corrigan DJ, Di BG, Ianniello R, Silvestri N, Breda S, Fontanesi S, et al. Engine knock detection methods for spark ignition and prechamber combustion systems in a high-performance gasoline direct injection engine. SAE International Journal of Engines. 2022; 15(6):883-97.

[14][14]Briggs T, Alger T, Mangold B. Advanced ignition systems evaluations for high-dilution SI engines. SAE International Journal of Engines. 2014; 7(4):1802-7.

[15][15]Merola SS, Irimescu A, Valentino G, Tornatore C, Silva S, Grimaldi A, et al. Experimental evaluation of an advanced ignition system for GDI engines. SAE International Journal of Engines. 2015; 8(5):2351-67.

[16][16]Allison PM, De OM, Giusti A, Mastorakos E. Pre-chamber ignition mechanism: experiments and simulations on turbulent JET flame structure. Fuel. 2018; 230:274-81.

[17][17]Pielecha I, Bueschke W, Skowron M, Fiedkiewicz Ł, Szwajca F. Prechamber optimal selection for a two stage turbulent jet ignition type combustion system in CNG-fuelled engine. Combustion Engines. 2019; 58(1):16-26.

[18][18]Alvarez CE, Couto GE, Roso VR, Thiriet AB, Valle RM. A review of prechamber ignition systems as lean combustion technology for SI engines. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2018; 128:107-20.

[19][19]Korb B, Kuppa K, Nguyen HD, Dinkelacker F, Wachtmeister G. Experimental and numerical investigations of charge motion and combustion in lean-burn natural gas engines. Combustion and Flame. 2020; 212:309-22.

[20][20]Macián V, Salvador FJ, De LMJ, Pagano V. Combustion analysis of a stratified pre-chamber ignition system by means of a zero-dimensional turbulence and flame speed model. Combustion and Flame. 2021; 232:111526.

[21][21]Benajes J, Novella R, Gómez-soriano J, Barbery I, Libert C, Rampanarivo F, et al. Computational assessment towards understanding the energy conversion and combustion process of lean mixtures in passive pre-chamber ignited engines. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2020; 178:115501.

[22][22]Müller C, Morcinkowski B, Schernus C, Habermann K, Uhlmann T. Development of a pre-chamber for spark ignition engines in vehicle applications. In ignition systems for gasoline engines: 4th international conference, 2018, Berlin, Germany. Ed.: M. Günther 2018 (pp. 261-74).

[23][23]Ghorbani A, Steinhilber G, Markus D, Maas U. Ignition by transient hot turbulent jets: an investigation of ignition mechanisms by means of a PDF/REDIM method. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2015; 35(2):2191-8.

[24][24]Gholamisheeri M, Wichman IS, Toulson E. A study of the turbulent jet flow field in a methane fueled turbulent JET ignition (TJI) system. Combustion and Flame. 2017; 183:194-206.

[25][25]Validi A, Schock H, Jaberi F. Turbulent JET ignition assisted combustion in a rapid compression machine. Combustion and Flame. 2017; 186:65-82.

[26][26]Novella R, Gómez-soriano J, Martínez-hernándiz PJ, Libert C, Rampanarivo F. Improving the performance of the passive pre-chamber ignition concept for spark-ignition engines fueled with natural gas. Fuel. 2021; 290:119971.

[27][27]Thelen BC, Toulson E. A computational study of the effects of spark location on the performance of a turbulent JET ignition system. SAE technical paper, world congress & exhibition 2016.

[28][28]Bunce M, Blaxill H, Kulatilaka W, Jiang N. The effects of turbulent jet characteristics on engine performance using a pre-chamber combustor. SAE technical paper, world congress & exhibition 2014.

[29][29]Jamrozik A, Tutak W, Kociszewski A, Sosnowski M. Numerical simulation of two-stage combustion in SI engine with prechamber. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 2013; 37(5):2961-82.

[30][30]Shah A, Tunestal P, Johansson B. Effect of pre-chamber volume and nozzle diameter on pre-chamber ignition in heavy duty natural gas engines. SAE technical paper, world congress & exhibition 2015.

[31][31]Tian J, Cui Z, Ren Z, Tian H, Long W. Experimental study on JET ignition and combustion processes of natural gas. Fuel. 2020; 262:116467.

[32][32]Lu C, Song E, Xu C, Ni Z, Yang X, Dong Q. Analysis of performance of passive pre-chamber on a lean-burn natural gas engine under low load. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2023; 11(3):1-17

[33][33]Liu F, Zhou L, Zhang Y, Liu C, Wei H. Effects of orifice diameter of pre-chamber jet ignition on the combustion characteristics and pressure oscillations in a kerosene-fueled engine. Journal of Energy Resources Technology. 2023; 145(3):032302.

[34][34]Li Y, Luo H, Gao W, Chen H, Zhan W, Du J. Effects of combustion and emissions of turbulent JET ignition with a small-volume prechamber for a gasoline engine. Journal of Energy Engineering. 2022; 148(4):04022021.

[35][35]Sementa P, Catapano F, Di ISI, Todino M, Vaglieco BM. Turbulent JET ignition effect on exhaust emission and efficiency of a SI small engine fueled with methane and gasoline. SAE technical paper, conference on sustainable mobility 2020.

[36][36]Antolini J, Sementa P, Tornatore C, Catapano F, Vaglieco BM, Desantes JM, et al. Effect of passive pre-chamber orifice diameter on the methane combustion process in an optically accessible SI engine. Fuel. 2023; 341:126990.

[37][37]Silva M, Liu X, Hlaing P, Sanal S, Cenker E, Chang J, et al. Computational assessment of effects of throat diameter on combustion and turbulence characteristics in a pre-chamber engine. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2022; 212:118595.

[38][38]Hua J, Zhou L, Gao Q, Feng Z, Wei H. Influence of pre-chamber structure and injection parameters on engine performance and combustion characteristics in a turbulent JET ignition (TJI) engine. Fuel. 2021; 283:119236.

[39][39]Gholamisheeri M, Givler S, Toulson E. Large eddy simulation of a homogeneously charged turbulent jet ignition system. International Journal of Engine Research. 2019; 20(2):181-93.

[40][40]Gentz G, Thelen B, Gholamisheeri M, Litke P, Brown A, Hoke J, et al. A study of the influence of orifice diameter on a turbulent JET ignition system through combustion visualization and performance characterization in a rapid compression machine. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2015; 81:399-411.

[41][41]Kim WT, Huth KY, Lee JW, Kang KY. Numerical simulation of intake and compression flow in a four-valve pent-roof spark ignition engine and validation with LDV data. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering. 2000; 214(4):361-72.

[42][42]Gunasekaran J, Ganesan V. Effect of swirl and tumble on the stratified combustion of a DISI engine-a CFD study. SAE technical paper world congress & exhibition 2011.

[43][43]Colin O, Truffin K. A spark ignition model for large eddy simulation based on an FSD transport equation (ISSIM-LES). Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2011; 33(2):3097-104.

[44][44]Ramesh P, Gunasekaran J. Emission reduction in a GDI engine with different injection timings - a CFD investigation. International Review on Modelling and Simulations. 2014; 7(4).