Revealing trends: a 25-year bibliometric analysis of MANETs in disaster research publications using the Scopus database
Fatin Fazain Mohd Affandi, Nor Aida Mahiddin, Zarina Mohamad and Nurul I. Sarkar
Abstract
Mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) are crucial for disaster management, enabling communication and coordination when traditional infrastructures are unavailable or compromised. This study provides a bibliometric analysis of global research on MANETs in disaster scenarios, covering publications from 1997 to 2022 sourced from Scopus. From an initial pool of 1,794 articles, 1,745 articles were selected for detailed review and analysis. The analysis examines trends in publication volumes, patterns of co-authorship among countries and institutions, and the co-occurrence of author keywords. The findings reveal a significant increase in MANET disaster-related publications since 2005, with India, the United States, and China leading in contributions and international collaboration. This study highlights the evolving research landscape and identifies critical areas for future investigation. It indicates the need for continued exploration into MANETs' role in disaster scenarios to enhance their practical application and effectiveness.
Keyword
Mobile ad hoc network, Disaster management, Bibliometric analysis, Scopus database, Trend.
Cite this article
Affandi FF, Mahiddin NA, Mohamad Z, Sarkar NI.Revealing trends: a 25-year bibliometric analysis of MANETs in disaster research publications using the Scopus database. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2024;11(119):1363-1391. DOI:10.19101/IJATEE.2024.111100648
Refference
[1]Aardal KI, Van HSP, Koster AM, Mannino C, Sassano A. Models and solution techniques for frequency assignment problems. Annals of Operations Research. 2007; 153:79-129.
[2]Zakaria AH, Saman MY, Noor AS, Hassan H. Finding shortest routing solution in mobile ad hoc networks using firefly algorithm and queuing network analysis. Jurnal Teknologi. 2015; 77(18):17-22.
[3]Kniess J, Petri M, Parpinelli RS. An energy-efficient bio-scheduling model for emergency networks. In IEEE wireless communications and networking conference 2021 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[4]Walunjkar G, Rao AK. Simulation and evaluation of different mobility models in disaster scenarios. In 4th international conference on recent trends on electronics, information, communication & technology 2019 (pp. 464-9). IEEE.
[5]Affandi FF, Mahiddin NA, Mohamad Z. DRT mobility model for search and rescue operations based on catastrophic intensity to improve the quality of services. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2024; 11(112):332-53.
[6]Kwon Y, Song J. System-reliability-based disaster resilience analysis of infrastructure networks and causality-based importance measure. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering. 2023; 9(3):1-22.
[7]Kirby A. Exploratory bibliometrics: using VOSviewer as a preliminary research tool. Publications. 2023; 11(1):1-14.
[8]Moral-muñoz JA, López-herrera AG, Herrera-viedma E, Cobo MJ. Science mapping analysis software tools: a review. Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. 2019:159-85.
[9]Bhatia TK, Ramachandran RK, Doss R, Pan L. Data congestion in VANETs: research directions and new trends through a bibliometric analysis. The Journal of Supercomputing. 2021; 77:6586-628.
[10]Martín-martín A, Orduna-malea E, Thelwall M, López-cózar ED. Google scholar, web of science, and scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics. 2018; 12(4):1160-77.
[11]Vieira ES, Gomes JA. A comparison of Scopus and web of science for a typical university. Scientometrics. 2009; 81:587-600.
[12]Mishra D, Gunasekaran A, Papadopoulos T, Childe SJ. Big data and supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis. Annals of Operations Research. 2018; 270:313-36.
[13]https://www.vosviewer.com/. Accessed 23 May 2023.
[14]Van ENJ, Waltman L, Dekker R, Van DBJ. A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2010; 61(12):2405-16.
[15]Klavans R, Boyack KW. Toward a consensus map of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2009; 60(3):455-76.
[16]Van EN, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010; 84(2):523-38.
[17]Newman ME. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2004; 101(suppl_1):5200-5.
[18]Wang CH, Lin CC, Lee Y, Kuo JH. Mapping the intellectual structure of mobile ad hoc networks. Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences. 2012; 4(1): 432-441.
[19]Liang W, Li Z, Zhang H, Wang S, Bie R. Vehicular ad hoc networks: architectures, research issues, methodologies, challenges, and trends. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. 2015; 11(8):1-11.
[20]umra IA, Sellappan P, Abdullah A, Ali A. Security issues and challenges in MANET-VANET-FANET: a survey. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web. 2018; 5(17):1-6.
[21]Gupta R, Patel P. A survey on vehicular ad hoc networks. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. 2016; 15(4):34-42.
[22]Lee M, Atkison T. VANET applications: past, present, and future. Vehicular Communications. 2021; 28:100310.
[23]Rodríguez-baeza JA, Magán-carrión R, Ruiz-villalobos P. Advances on security in ad hoc networks: a preliminary analysis. In 16th Iberian conference on information systems and technologies 2021 (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
[24]Aldana JA, Maag S, Zaïdi F. MANETs interoperability: current trends and open research. IIn 32d international conference on advanced information networking and applications workshops 2018 (pp. 481-7). IEEE.
[25]Fratta L, Gerla M, Lim KW. Emerging trends and applications in ad hoc networks. Annals of Telecommunications. 2018; 73:547-8.
[26]Cavalcanti ER, De SJA, Spohn MA, Gomes RC, Costa AF. VANETsresearch over the past decade: overview, credibility, and trends. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. 2018; 48(2):31-9.
[27]Mahi MJ, Chaki S, Ahmed S, Biswas M, Kaiser MS, Islam MS, et al. A review on VANET research: perspective of recent emerging technologies. IEEE Access. 2022; 10:65760-83.
[28]Sanchezl LC, Parra OJS, Rico MJE. The evolution of VANET networks: a review of emerging trends in artificial intelligence and software-defined networks. Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT). 2023; 13(22):209-19.
[29]Dalal R, Khari M, Misra S. Speculative analysis of wireless network by bibliometrics tool. Wireless Personal Communications. 2024; 135:2039-59.
[30]Xie F, Hua KA, Wang W, Ho YH. Performance study of live video streaming over highway vehicular ad hoc networks. In 66th vehicular technology conference 2007 (pp. 2121-5). IEEE.
[31]Zhu H, Lin X, Lu R, Ho PH, Shen X. AEMA: an aggregated emergency message authentication scheme for enhancing the security of vehicular ad hoc networks. In international conference on communications 2008 (pp. 1436-40). IEEE.
[32]Gerla M, Zhou B, Lee YZ, Soldo F, Lee U, Marfia G. Vehicular grid communications: the role of the internet infrastructure. In proceedings of the 2nd annual international workshop on wireless internet 2006. ACM.
[33]Sumayya PA, Shefeena PS. VANET based vehicle tracking module for safe and efficient road transportation system. Procedia Computer Science. 2015; 46:1173-80.
[34]Rajput NS, Banerjee R, Siwach A, Rajput A. e-ARP: an efficient, adaptive and robust protocol for effective data communication in VANETs. In TENCON IEEE region 10 conference 2017 (pp. 1263-8). IEEE.
[35]Yang Q, Shen L. A multi-hop broadcast scheme for propagation of emergency messages in VANET. In 12th international conference on communication technology 2010 (pp. 1072-5). IEEE.
[36]Liu J, Yang Z, Stojmenovic I. Receiver consensus: on-time warning delivery for vehicular ad-hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing. 2013; 1(1):57-68.
[37]Al-tekreeti S, Adams C, Al-jawad N. Creating Wi-Fi bluetooth mesh network for crisis management applications. In mobile multimedia/image processing, security, and applications 2010 (pp. 325-36). SPIE.
[38]Ramrekha TA, Millar GP, Politis C. A model for designing scalable and efficient adaptive routing approaches in emergency ad hoc communications. In symposium on computers and communications 2011 (pp. 916-23). IEEE.
[39]Steere DC, Baptista A, Mcnamee D, Pu C, Walpole J. Research challenges in environmental observation and forecasting systems. In proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking 2000 (pp. 292-9). ACM.
[40]Deng DJ, Chen HC, Chao HC, Huang YM. A collision alleviation scheme for IEEE 802.11 p VANETs. Wireless Personal Communications. 2011; 56:371-83.
[41]Jha A, Vivek V, Gupta P, Joshi R, Singh P, Iyengar NC. Trust aware secure energy efficient hybrid protocol for MANET. In international conference on artificial intelligence and smart communication 2023 (pp. 1105-9). IEEE.
[42]Tan S, Li X, Dong Q. Trust based routing mechanism for securing OSLR-based MANET. Ad Hoc Networks. 2015; 30:84-98.
[43]Mase K. Information and communication technology and electric vehicles–paving the way towards a smart community. IEICE Transactions on Communications. 2012; 95(6):1902-10.
[44]Benkerdagh S, Duvallet C. Cluster‐based emergency message dissemination strategy for VANET using V2V communication. International Journal of Communication Systems. 2019; 32(5):e3897.
[45]Farooq W, Ali KM, Rehman S. A novel real time framework for cluster based multicast communication in vehicular ad hoc networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. 2016; 12(4):8064908.
[46]Martinez FJ, Toh CK, Cano JC, Calafate CT, Manzoni P. A survey and comparative study of simulators for vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs). Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. 2011; 11(7):813-28.
[47]Bi Y, Shan H, Shen XS, Wang N, Zhao H. A multi-hop broadcast protocol for emergency message dissemination in urban vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2015; 17(3):736-50.
[48]Chandrasekharamenon NP, AnchareV B. Connectivity analysis of one-dimensional vehicular ad hoc networks in fading channels. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking. 2012; 2012:1-6.
[49]Narayana VL, Bharathi CR. Identity based cryptography for mobile ad hoc networks. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology. 2017; 95(5):1173-81.
[50]Glänzel W, Schubert A. Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In handbook of quantitative science and technology research: the use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems 2004 (pp. 257-76). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
[51]Ran C, Yan S, Huang L, Zhang L. An improved AODV routing security algorithm based on blockchain technology in ad hoc network. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking. 2021; 2021(1):1-16.
[52]Panda SK, Jena AK, Swain SK, Satapathy SC. Blockchain technology: applications and challenges. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2021.
[53]Zamri N, Mohamad Z, Nik WN, Mohamad AH. Smart secure telerehabilitation apps for personalized autism home intervention using blockchain system. Blockchain for 5G-Enabled IoT: The New Wave for Industrial Automation. 2021:377-98.
[54]Li X, Jiang P, Chen T, Luo X, Wen Q. A survey on the security of blockchain systems. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2020; 107:841-53.
[55]Rajeswari AR, Lai WC, Kavitha C, Balasubramanian PK, Srividhya SR. A trust-based secure neuro fuzzy clustering technique for mobile ad hoc networks. Electronics. 2023; 12(2):1-16.
[56]Bharti M, Rani S, Singh P. Efficient cluster head selection and trust based routing in MANET. In journal of physics: conference series 2022 (pp. 1-8). IOP Publishing.
[57]Ramya R, Brindha T. A comprehensive review on optimal cluster head selection in WSN-IOT. Advances in Engineering Software. 2022; 171:103170.
[58]Muzakkari BA, Mohamed MA, Kadir MF, Mohamad Z, Jamil N. Recent advances in energy efficient-QoS aware MAC protocols for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Advanced Computer Research. 2018; 8(38):212-28.
[59]Damaj I, Al KSK, Naous T, Lawand W, Abdelrazzak ZZ, Mouftah HT. Intelligent transportation systems: a survey on modern hardware devices for the era of machine learning. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences. 2022; 34(8):5921-42.
[60]Himawan H, Hassan A, Bahaman NA. A systematic literature review: intelligent vehicular communication system on VANET. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2022; 7(2):212-29.
[61]Lozano DJM, Mateo STJ. Review on v2x, i2x, and p2x communications and their applications: a comprehensive analysis over time. Sensors. 2019; 19(12):1-29.
[62]Rejeb A, Rejeb K, Simske S, Treiblmaier H, Zailani S. The big picture on the internet of things and the smart city: a review of what we know and what we need to know. Internet of Things. 2022; 19:100565.
[63]Zhao F, Fashola OI, Olarewaju TI, Onwumere I. Smart city research: a holistic and state-of-the-art literature review. Cities. 2021; 119:103406.
[64]Nwuku YE, Ajibesin AA, Ishaq AT, Abel A. A comprehensive analysis of proactive and reactive MANET routing protocols using Ns3. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences Technology. 2021; 3(1):1-6.
[65]Zagrouba R, Kardi A. Comparative study of energy efficient routing techniques in wireless sensor networks. Information. 2021; 12(1):1-28.
[66]Viswanath K, Obraczka K, Tsudik G. Exploring mesh and tree-based multicast routing protocols for MANETs. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing. 2005; 5(1):28-42.
[67]Alazawi Z, Alani O, Abdljabar MB, Altowaijri S, Mehmood R. A smart disaster management system for future cities. In proceedings of the international workshop on wireless and mobile technologies for smart cities 2014 (pp. 1-10). ACM.
[68]Garcia-santiago A, Castaneda-camacho J, Guerrero-castellanos JF, Mino-aguilar G. Evaluation of AODV and DSDV routing protocols for a FANET: further results towards robotic vehicle networks. In 9th Latin American symposium on circuits & systems 2018 (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
[69]Chenchen Y, Xiaohong L, Dafang Z. An obstacle avoidance mobility model. In international conference on intelligent computing and intelligent systems 2010 (pp. 130-4). IEEE.
[70]Nelson SC, Harris IIIAF, Kravets R. Event-driven, role-based mobility in disaster recovery networks. In proceedings of the second workshop on challenged networks 2007 (pp. 27-34). ACM.
[71]Arulkumaran G, Gnanamurthy RK. Fuzzy trust approach for detecting black hole attack in mobile adhoc network. Mobile Networks and Applications. 2019; 24:386-93.
[72]Mehta K, Bajaj PR, Malik LG. Fuzzy bacterial foraging optimization zone based routing (FBFOZBR) protocol for VANET. In international conference on ICT in business industry & government 2016 (pp. 1-10). IEEE.
[73]Jadhav RS, Dongre MM, Devurkar G. Fuzzy logic based data dissemination in vehicular ad hoc networks. In international conference of electronics, communication and aerospace technology 2017 (pp. 479-83). IEEE.
[74]Kulla E, Spaho E, Xhafa F, Barolli L, Takizawa M. Using data replication for improving QoS in MANETs. In seventh international conference on broadband, wireless computing, communication and applications 2012 (pp. 529-33). IEEE.
[75]Sengan S, Khalaf OI, Rao GR, Sharma DK, Amarendra K, Hamad AA. Security-aware routing on wireless communication for E-health records monitoring using machine learning. International Journal of Reliable and Quality E-Healthcare. 2022; 11(3):1-10.
[76]Almalki FA, Angelides MC. Deployment of an aerial platform system for rapid restoration of communications links after a disaster: a machine learning approach. Computing. 2020; 102(4):829-64.
[77]Yoo SJ, Choi SH. Indoor AR navigation and emergency evacuation system based on machine learning and IoT technologies. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 2022; 9(21):20853-68.
[78]Nazar K, Saeed Y, Ali A, Algarni AD, Soliman NF, Ateya AA, et al. Towards intelligent zone-based content pre-caching approach in VANET for congestion control. Sensors. 2022; 22(23):1-29.
[79]Ashtaiwi A. ML-based localizing and driving direction estimation system for vehicular networks. In international conference on artificial intelligence in information and communication 2021 (pp. 465-70). IEEE.
[80]Feng F, Liu X, Yong B, Zhou R, Zhou Q. Anomaly detection in ad-hoc networks based on deep learning model: a plug and play device. Ad Hoc Networks. 2019; 84:82-9.
[81]Lee Y. Classification of node degree based on deep learning and routing method applied for virtual route assignment. Ad Hoc Networks. 2017; 58:70-85.
[82]Chemodanov D, Esposito F, Sukhov A, Calyam P, Trinh H, Oraibi Z. AGRA: AI-augmented geographic routing approach for IoT-based incident-supporting applications. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2019; 92:1051-65.
[83]Yu Y, Zeng X, Xue X, Ma J. LSTM-based intrusion detection system for VANETs: a time series classification approach to false message detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2022; 23(12):23906-18.
[84]Nishi M, Kozato H, Ota Y, Shin K. Development of disaster monitoring techniques in the grass-root information distribution system for detecting landslide dangers. In SmartWorld, ubiquitous intelligence & computing, advanced & trusted computing, scalable computing & communications, cloud & big data computing, internet of people and smart city innovation 2018 (pp. 1599-604). IEEE.
[85]Reina DG, Toral SL, Leon-coca JM, Barrero F, Bessis N, Asimakopoulou E. An evolutionary computational approach for optimizing broadcasting in disaster response scenarios. In seventh international conference on innovative mobile and internet services in ubiquitous computing 2013 (pp. 94-100). IEEE.
[86]Preetha V, Chitra K. Prediction of stability of the clusters in MANET using genetic algorithm. In international conference on advances in computer applications 2016 (pp. 338-41). IEEE.
[87]Wang J, Matsumoto K, Cheng Z, Zhou Y. A location optimization method based on communication requirements to reconnect separated communication areas after a disaster. In international conference on green computing and communications and IEEE internet of things and IEEE Cyber, physical and social computing 2013 (pp. 653-7). IEEE.
[88]Viswacheda DV, Arifranto MS, Hamid MY, Barukang L. QOS of efficient GA-EMAN routing method for future mobile tele-emergency system. In international conference on intelligent and advanced systems 2007 (pp. 378-82). IEEE.