Abstract

The scope of this presented work involves the study on effect of cutting speed and feed rate of a customized coated high-speed steel (HSS) tool on thrust force, torque and surface integrity. The standard European norms 8 (EN8) specimen is selected, and its hardness is varied as 15, 20 and 25 Rockwell hardness on the Rockwell C scale (HRC) to make ease of research. Four tools with the composition of R1, R2, R3 and R4 were chosen. Maximum of 67 N thrust force and 8.9 µm surface roughness was obtained at 12.57 m/min cutting speed for 25 HRC specimen. Lower value of thrust force and surface roughness was observed for tool 2. Low as 1.90 µm surface roughness was noticed for 15 HRC specimen when the speed of cut given is 1500 rpm and 1.8µm at a feed rate of 5 mm/rev. A minimum thrust force of 6 and 8 N was observed for feed rate and cutting speed of 5 mm/rev and 62.86 m/min respectively. It was noticed that, thrust force increases gradually when the rate of feed enhanced and is reduced with respect to increase in cutting speed. The tool shows poor performance at the 25 HRC specimen at maximum operating conditions. Tool 2 gives better performance for 15 and 20 HRC of EN8. Thus, tool 2 with R2 composition can be employed till the hardness level of 20 HRC without losing quality of the work.

Keyword

Physical vapour deposition, EN8 (080M40), Thrust force, Torque, Surface integrity.

Cite this article

Cite this Article

Refference

[1]Obi Y, Claudio KS, Budiman VM, Achmad S, Kurniawan A. Sign language recognition system for communicating to people with disabilities. Procedia Computer Science. 2023; 216:13-20.

[2]Riad AM, Elminir HK, Shohieb SM. Hand gesture recognition system based on a geometric model and rule based classifier. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology. 2014; 4(9):1432-44.

[3]Mariappan HM, Gomathi V. Real-time recognition of Indian sign language. In international conference on computational intelligence in data science (ICCIDS) 2019 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

[4]Wu J, Sun L, Jafari R. A wearable system for recognizing American sign language in real-time using IMU and surface EMG sensors. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. 2016; 20(5):1281-90.

[5]Rekha J, Bhattacharya J, Majumder S. Hand gesture recognition for sign language: a new hybrid approach. In proceedings of the international conference on image processing, computer vision, and pattern recognition (IPCV) 2011 (pp. 1-7). WorldComp.

[6]Huu PN, Phung NT. Hand gesture recognition algorithm using SVM and HOG model for control of robotic system. Journal of Robotics. 2021; 2021:1-3.

[7]Shinde P, Shinde P, Shinde S, Shinde S, Shinde S. Augmented reptile feeder. In Pune section international conference (PuneCon) 2022 (pp. 1-4). IEEE.

[8]Ismail MH, Dawwd SA, Ali FH. A review on Arabic sign language recognition. Journal of Advances in Computer and Electronics Engineering. 2021; 6(12):1-12.

[9]Michele A, Colin V, Santika DD. Mobilenet convolutional neural networks and support vector machines for palmprint recognition. Procedia Computer Science. 2019; 157:110-7.

[10]Carney M, Webster B, Alvarado I, Phillips K, Howell N, Griffith J, et al. Teachable machine: approachable web-based tool for exploring machine learning classification. In extended abstracts of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems 2020 (pp. 1-8). ACM.

[11]Dogo EM, Afolabi OJ, Nwulu NI, Twala B, Aigbavboa CO. A comparative analysis of gradient descent-based optimization algorithms on convolutional neural networks. In international conference on computational techniques, electronics and mechanical systems (CTEMS) 2018 (pp. 92-9). IEEE.

[12]Obi Y, Claudio KS, Budiman VM, Achmad S, Kurniawan A. Sign language recognition system for communicating to people with disabilities. Procedia Computer Science. 2023; 216:13-20.

[13]Riad AM, Elminir HK, Shohieb SM. Hand gesture recognition system based on a geometric model and rule based classifier. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology. 2014; 4(9):1432-44.

[14]Mariappan HM, Gomathi V. Real-time recognition of Indian sign language. In international conference on computational intelligence in data science (ICCIDS) 2019 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

[15]Wu J, Sun L, Jafari R. A wearable system for recognizing American sign language in real-time using IMU and surface EMG sensors. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. 2016; 20(5):1281-90.

[16]Rekha J, Bhattacharya J, Majumder S. Hand gesture recognition for sign language: a new hybrid approach. In proceedings of the international conference on image processing, computer vision, and pattern recognition (IPCV) 2011 (pp. 1-7). WorldComp.

[17]Huu PN, Phung NT. Hand gesture recognition algorithm using SVM and HOG model for control of robotic system. Journal of Robotics. 2021; 2021:1-3.

[18]Shinde P, Shinde P, Shinde S, Shinde S, Shinde S. Augmented reptile feeder. In Pune section international conference (PuneCon) 2022 (pp. 1-4). IEEE.

[19]Ismail MH, Dawwd SA, Ali FH. A review on Arabic sign language recognition. Journal of Advances in Computer and Electronics Engineering. 2021; 6(12):1-12.

[20]Michele A, Colin V, Santika DD. Mobilenet convolutional neural networks and support vector machines for palmprint recognition. Procedia Computer Science. 2019; 157:110-7.

[21]Carney M, Webster B, Alvarado I, Phillips K, Howell N, Griffith J, et al. Teachable machine: approachable web-based tool for exploring machine learning classification. In extended abstracts of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems 2020 (pp. 1-8). ACM.

[22]Dogo EM, Afolabi OJ, Nwulu NI, Twala B, Aigbavboa CO. A comparative analysis of gradient descent-based optimization algorithms on convolutional neural networks. In international conference on computational techniques, electronics and mechanical systems (CTEMS) 2018 (pp. 92-9). IEEE.