Abstract

In recent years, E-commerce has become one of the fastest growing industry and constantly provided better services for the customers. Such incredible advance was partially thanks to the mature development of the semantic web technologies with better content support for the search engines and recommender systems. Moreover, with rich embedded information, hypervideo has turned out to be a promising way of online shopping. In order to facilitate its development, GoodRelations ontology has been developed to make the video more comprehensive for both the users and machines. However, due to the vastness and diversity of the internet, the existing methodologies could not reach a consensus on the information annotated by the participants. Therefore, in this study, we propose a semantic video annotation framework using consensus quality of the collaborative process and GoodRelations ontology as the domain knowledge. This approach has been demonstrated to enhance the quality of the annotated information, but still maintain the flexibility for the vendors to sell their products interactively on the videos. As a result, this study provides a robust and reliable video annotation platform to be used in the E-commerce industry.

Keyword

E-commerce, GoodRelations ontology, Video annotation, Collaborative framework, Consensus quality.

Cite this article

Refference

[1][1]Gomez-Perez A, Fernández-López M, Corcho O. Ontological Engineering: with examples from the areas of knowledge management, e-Commerce and the semantic web. Springer Science and Business Media; 2006.

[2][2]Hepp M. Goodrelations: An ontology for describing products and services offers on the web. In international conference on knowledge engineering and knowledge management 2008 (pp. 329-46). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[3][3]Duong T, Rosli A, Sean V, Lee KS, Jo GS. E-Commerce video annotation using good relations-based LODs with faceted search in smart TV environment. International conference on computational collective intelligence 2012 (pp.253-63).

[4][4]Lippman A. Movie-maps: an application of the optical videodisc to computer graphics. In ACM siggraph computer graphics 1980 (pp. 32-42). ACM.

[5][5]Aubert O, Prié Y. Advene: active reading through hypervideo. In proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on hypertext and hypermedia 2005 (pp. 235-44). ACM.

[6][6]Jeong JW, Hong HK, Lee DH. Ontology-based automatic video annotation technique in smart TV environment. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics. 2011;57(4).

[7][7]Naphade MR, Smith JR. On the detection of semantic concepts at TRECVID. In proceedings of the 12th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia 2004 (pp. 660-7). ACM.

[8][8]Park KW, Lee JH, Moon YS, Park SH, Lee DH. OLYVIA: ontology-based automatic video annotation and summarization system using semantic inference rules. In international conference on semantics, knowledge and grid 2007 (pp. 170-5). IEEE.

[9][9]Vondrick C, Patterson D, Ramanan D. Efficiently scaling up crowdsourced video annotation. International Journal of Computer Vision. 2013; 101(1):184-204.

[10][10]Yuen J, Russell B, Liu C, Torralba A. Labelme video: Building a video database with human annotations. In international conference on computer vision 2009 (pp. 1451-8). IEEE.

[11][11]Lee KS, Rosli AN, Supandi IA, Jo GS. Dynamic sampling-based interpolation algorithm for representation of clickable moving object in collaborative video annotation. Neurocomputing. 2014; 146:291-300.

[12][12]Khusro S, Khan M, Ullah I. Collaborative video annotation based on ontological themes, temporal duration and pointing regions. In proceedings of the international conference on informatics and systems 2016 (pp. 121-6). ACM.

[13][13]Goy A, Magro D, Petrone G, Picardi C, Segnan M. Ontology-driven collaborative annotation in shared workspaces. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2016; 54:435-49.

[14][14]Carbonaro A, Ferrini R. Ontology-based video annotation in multimedia entertainment. Consumer communications and networking conference 2007(pp. 1087-91).

[15][15]Xue M, Zheng S, Zhang C. Ontology-based surveillance video archive and retrieval system. In fifth international conference on advanced computational intelligence 2012 (pp. 84-9). IEEE.

[16][16]Ouyang JQ, Jin-tao L, Yong-dong Z. Ontology based sports video annotation and summary. In content computing 2004 (pp. 499-508). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[17][17]Gallagher M, Hares T, Spencer J, Bradshaw C, Webb I. The nominal group technique: a research tool for general practice?. Family Practice. 1993; 10(1):76-81.

[18][18]Pill J. The Delphi method: substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 1971; 5(1):57-71.

[19][19]Martinez-Cruz C, Blanco IJ, Vila MA. Ontologies versus relational databases: are they so different? A comparison. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2012; 38(4):271-90.

[20][20]Shimrat M. Algorithm 112: position of point relative to polygon. Communications of the ACM. 1962; 5(8):434.

[21][21]Duong TH, Nguyen NT, Nguyen DC, Nguyen TP, Selamat A. Trust-based consensus for collaborative ontology building. Cybernetics and Systems. 2014; 45(2):146-64.

[22][22]Duong TH, Nguyen NT, Nguyen DC, Nguyen TP, Selamat A. Trust-based consensus for collaborative ontology building. Cybernetics and Systems. 2014; 45(2):146-64.

[23][23]Nguyen NT. Advanced methods for inconsistent knowledge management. Springer Science & Business Media; 2007.